The AMD Ryzen 7 1700x is just $60 cheaper than its flagship 1800x stablemate, yet offers chock full of similar performance. So that should be the perfect example case of the company’s new Zen architecture, offering massive multi-threaded grunt for pennies on a dollar, right? Well, that is determined by whether you wish to continue overclocking your budget-priced Ryzen 7 1700 instead of getting Black Friday Deals & Sales which are spectacular days to buy your product at a low price.
These are the very best CPUs if you’re planning to game.
Please click on the table of contents to navigate this article.
Best Deals For AMD Ryzen 7 1700X on Amazon (Black Friday & Cyber Monday Sales)
The Ryzen 7 1700X is one of the more wallet-friendly models in AMD’s line, with a significantly lower price tag.
The release of only three Ryzen processors in an eight-core line is not indicative of a common AMD tactic. With its past lineup, the graphics card maker has typically released new products in pairs. They create one top-end model with all the current specs and another similar, but slightly less expensive. And it’s a tactic that has served them well.
But since the straight 65W Ryzen 7 1700 has got its own impressive CPU chops, choosing between that and the Ryzen 7 1700X is tricky.
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X benchmarks
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is the flagship of the third tier with a base frequency of 3.8GHz and a turbo boost to 4.0GHz. It has 8 cores per CPU, 16 total which behaves very similarly to Intel’s rival chips in terms of design and performance levels at comparable prices. It also uses the same 14nm developmental process as others and fits neatly within the same AM4 motherboard platform, because all AMD chips should. Right, AMD?
AMD’s Zen architecture has previously been successfully used in the Ryzen 7 1800X. Now AMD has earned some silicon wonders to make affordable eight-core processors for this series of CPUs.
AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X falls somewhere in the middle of AMD’s octa-core line, with 16 logical cores to take advantage of parallel computing. The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X runs at a base clock speed of 3.4GHz (3.8-liter bus) and has an unlocked multiplier, so you can go as high as you want if your cooling is up to the task.
The 1700X (£428) and the 1800X (£580) have different clock speeds but are otherwise much of a muchness.
Fortunately, the price is reasonable.
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X benchmarks
Once again, it’s the straight CPU performance that really makes the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X stand out. More notably, its multi-threaded cores allow for much better use of eight cores instead of just four as with Intel’s chip. Benchmarks from stock speeds show that the 1700X is inevitably slower than its sister 1800X, but still faster than both Intel chips. That is true in both Cinebench rendering and X264 encoding tests.
The Core i7 8700K is cheaper, but the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a better performance lead in multi-threaded applications.
The memory bandwidth is at the Intel pace, because of the AM4 platform’s struggle with managing to fill its four DIMM slots with high-speed memory and because it only has a capacity for functioning in dual-channel mode when the X99 setup can work in quad-channel.
Like the other Ryzen processors it is also just a little flaky on the storage performance too. It is possibly right down to the relationship between memory speed, the Infinity Fabric and bus speeds of PCIe, although 4K random performance in our speedy Samsung 960 EVO NVMe drive is usually sadly not comparable to either Intel X99 or Z270 platforms.
Because the R7 1700X has a slower clock speed, its single-threaded performance can’t quite keep up with Intel Core architecture. Now that Ryzen’s performance has evened out, AMD chips are not significantly behind Intel.
Against the 8700K, the 1700X is around 23% slower in our Civ VI and Total War benchmarks. However, it’s a touch quicker in GTA V and has close to parity in our DX 12 Tomb Raider and Vulkan Doom tests. The Hitman test, much like other benchmarks we’ve seen in the past, shows that sometimes even though there is CPU power for some game engines they are unaffected by GPU performance and will perform similarly on different CPUs as long as they have similar specifications.
I also have benchmarks that are designed to show relative CPU performance in gaming. The CPUs are tested at 1080p, where the GPU load is lower.
Almost equally as interesting as the Intel vs. AMD gaming debate is the performance of Ryzen’s octa-core chips themselves. There is virtually no difference between your Ryzen 7 1700X and the 1800X, except in one particular Vulkan benchmark. Despite the reduced speed clocks, both CPUs perform equally well.
Increased overclocking performance is expected, but the cheaper Rs. 65-Watt Ryzen 7 1700 can significantly impact peak performance. Our 1700x couldn’t quite reach the 4ghz mark without overclocking, but it was close to achieving that goal despite a lack of XFR.
If you plan on purchasing the AMD Ryzen 7 1700x online, it can be ordered from Amazon US, Newegg, and Overclockers.
The Ryzen 7 1700X is a great CPU, but not worth the price difference from its sibling. Though it’s a close second to Intel for efficiency, the higher-end Ryzen chip outperforms it on all fronts.
If you’re into both gaming AND multi-threaded activity, in that case, the Ryzen might be more tempting.
I’d wager there are a lot of gamers who enjoy playing Mass Effect Andromeda and also do some 3D rendering or encoding while they use the CPU as well. Likewise, I assume there’s a small number of professional streamers But with the Ryzen chip, you’ll be able to manage whatever time-intensive CPU tasks you have sitting around much quicker than an Intel chipset and still touch on gaming without other things stealing system resources.
The compatibility points with the Ryzen 7 1700 are proving to be a sticking point for most people. With a simple overclocking wand, you can make this much cheaper chip perform just as well as either the 1800X or 1700X. Finding a new high core-count CPU has always been tricky for me, but then I was pleased to see that AMD came out with the 1700X. However, it is important to note that since this chip is an X variant, overclocking will be risky and you would have to do it under water cooling. But if these two things are not